Seeking peers for a confidential review and feedback on a paper focusing on M365 Purview Records Management from the large enterprise adoption perspective. This is such a complicated topic that I want to get the potential advantages and gotchas right. I also want outside perspectives to make sure that I am being fair and reasonable in my opinions before publication. The paper and potentially my supporting materials will be published without paywall after peer review, hopefully MSFT review and final edits. Reviewers should have deep real-world experience with some or all the current Purview E5 records management functionality:

  • File plan
  • Policies – static/adaptive on various sources
  • Record/Sensitivity labels
  • Classifiers
  • Disposition

If you can provide confidential and meaningful feedback, please contact me at to get on the short list. Our community is in dire need of accurate, fair information. I need your help to make sure that what I publish contributes positively to those struggling with exploding storage and discovery bills.

Greg Buckles wants your feedback, questions or project inquiries at Contact him directly for a free 15 minute ‘Good Karma’ call if he has availability. He solves problems and creates eDiscovery solutions for enterprise and law firm clients.

Greg’s blog perspectives are personal opinions and should not be interpreted as a professional judgment or advice. Greg is no longer a journalist and all perspectives are based on best public information. Blog content is neither approved nor reviewed by any providers prior to being published. Do you want to share your own perspective? Greg is looking for practical, professional informative perspectives free of marketing fluff, hidden agendas or personal/product bias. Outside blogs will clearly indicate the author, company and any relevant affiliations. 


See Greg’s latest pic on Instagram.

0 0 votes
Article Rating