Essays

Asian Dawn for eDiscovery – Part 2 – Back from China

Migrated from eDJGroupInc.com. Author: . Published: 2013-06-25 16:27:54  I just returned from my trip to China and the week overseas went by very quickly.  As much as I’m glad to be back in Austin, I already miss the new friends I made in China.  I will be doing more in depth analysis on my experiences and what I’ve learned on eDiscovery in Asia, but [...]

By |2024-01-12T16:07:01-06:00January 12th, 2024|eDJ Migrated|0 Comments

eDJ Market Analysis on Legal Hold Notification

As announced in Barry Murphy’s March 2013 post, Legal Hold Notification (LHN) is on our analysts' radar and research agenda. LHN, although not a “new” eDiscovery topic, continues to be a current conversation and hover at the top of the priority list for corporate legal departments. The first report in the series, Bring Legal Holds to Life, was published in April and lays out the framework for developing an effective legal hold program. The next step is to frame out our analysis of the technologies on the market.

By |2024-01-12T16:07:01-06:00January 12th, 2024|eDJ Migrated|0 Comments

Predictive Coding Cooperation Experiment Gets Contentious

One of the most interesting predictive coding cases going on right now is In Re: Actos (Pioglitazone) Products Liability Litigation (United States District Court of Louisiana MDL No. 6:11-md-2299). The complexion of the case recently changed as the parties who originally agreed to use predictive coding (and in an innovative twist to even train the predictive coding software together) are now fighting over what the results mean. According to court documents filed by both parties (all available on the PACER website), the cooperation experiment is over and both sides are unable to find common ground to resolve their dispute over how next to proceed with the predictive coding results (see Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Production of Documents (“the Defendants’ Brief”) and the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Memorandum to Support (the “Plaintiffs Brief”)).

By |2024-01-12T16:07:01-06:00January 12th, 2024|eDJ Migrated|0 Comments

Will Dodd-Frank Requirements Drive Mobile eDiscovery?

Preparations for our eDJ webinar on the Dodd-Frank Act’s impact on IT next Thursday pushed me to dig further into the new CFTC record keeping requirements covering mobile devices, social media and mobile phone calls from the perspective of our guest legal speakers. As analysts, we tend to prioritize the technical, practical and market implications of new requirements over their potential strategic litigation impact. We are lucky enough to have former U.S. Magistrate Ronald Hedges and Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman’s eDiscovery Partner David Stanton to add their perspective to our webinar discussion. Although the new rules only cover communications directly relating to pre-execution of trades (see rule language below), they will require market participants to invest in capture, retention and retrieval capabilities that are clearly relevant to corporate eDiscovery obligations. This may result in a new wave of burden and accessibility arguments before the bench. Essentially, Dodd-Frank ‘could’ blow the lid off of the BYOD/cloud Pandora’s box. Too many litigants rely on a Don’t-Ask-For-Mine quid pro quo strategy to ignore these new, complicated data sources. When global corporate hedge and pension management exceeds the end-user exception threshold, corporate legal departments may suddenly find that their custodian’s mobile phones, IM and even phone calls migrate to active, accessible sources of ESI that must be preserved and collected. My experience is that discovery trends and expectations follow regulators and the big boys.

By |2024-01-12T16:07:01-06:00January 12th, 2024|eDJ Migrated|0 Comments

Dodd-Frank and the Single Girl

Many people joined me in assuming Dodd-Frank was just increased regulation of Wall Street following its 2008 meltdown, but boy, were we wrong. It’s pretty much about any and all US publicly traded companies, as well as most financial entities. As the SEC says about their own intentions, Dodd-Frank is “a framework that will support an entirely new regulatory regime”.

By |2024-01-12T16:07:01-06:00January 12th, 2024|eDJ Migrated|0 Comments

Predictive Coding Thought Leadership Series Launches Next Week In Philly

In the midst of a summer swoon and a New England heat wave, eDJ and Review Less launch the Predictive Coding Thought Leadership Series next Monday, July 22 in Philadelphia. This should be a great event, featuring facilitators from leading law firms like Schnader Harrison, Morgan Lewis and Pepper Hamilton as well as corporate facilitators from companies like Dupont (special thanks to event sponsor AlphaLit for making it possible to bring this cost-effective training to the market).The cost is only $150 for three CLE hours and the opportunity to get detailed education on Predictive Coding. If you would like to register, you can do so here: http://pcthoughtleadership.eventbrite.com/. This series will come to other cities throughout the fall – you can keep track here: http://ediscoveryjournal.com/programs/predictive-coding-thought-leadership-series/.

By |2024-01-12T16:07:01-06:00January 12th, 2024|eDJ Migrated|0 Comments

The Myth of Custodial Selection

Common sense, law school and practical experience all tell a litigator that interviewing a custodian is the best way to identify potential ESI. This made sense when the evidence was in the filing cabinet, but not when it is scattered over network shares and other systems.

By |2024-01-11T14:10:29-06:00January 11th, 2024|eDJ Migrated|0 Comments

Appealing Discovery Issues Just Got Tougher – Mohawk Industries v. Carpenter

Mohawk Industries v. Carpenter is Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s first opinion and while it first appears to be a simple procedural issue, it may have far reaching consequences with counsel making risk vs. cost decisions around their discovery efforts. The case involves a dispute over whether privilege waiver and other discovery related district court orders can be appealed during or after the case, whether it qualifies for an interlocutory appeal in lawyer speak. The unanimous opinion found that with some exceptions discovery decisions could only be appealed after the final judgment was rendered.

By |2024-01-11T14:10:29-06:00January 11th, 2024|eDJ Migrated|0 Comments

Measure Twice, Cut Once – Downsizing Legal Departments

Migrated from eDJGroupInc.com. Author: Greg Buckles. Published: 2010-01-26 12:24:21Format, images and links may no longer function correctly. 2009 has been a hard year for corporations of every size. The wave of high publicity eDiscovery sanctions in 2007-2008 had General Counsel’s focusing on reducing discovery risk before the economic down turn. Now they are tasked with cutting departmental budgets and the ever-growing cost of discovery. So [...]

By |2024-01-11T14:10:29-06:00January 11th, 2024|eDJ Migrated|0 Comments

ECA, the functionality behind the hype

Migrated from eDJGroupInc.com. Author: Greg Buckles. Published: 2010-01-26 12:26:52Format, images and links may no longer function correctly.                 The eDiscovery buzz word these days is ‘ECA’ or Early Case Assessment. But what does that really mean and what software functionality really comprises an ‘ECA solution’? The current Wikipedia definition of ECA appears to focus purely on scanning and generating reports on sources of unstructured ESI [...]

By |2024-01-11T14:10:30-06:00January 11th, 2024|eDJ Migrated|0 Comments
Go to Top