Posts Tagged ‘production’
hide story details [-]
- December 2nd
-
Software Necessary to View Files Subject to Production under NY Freedom of Information Law
TJS of New York, Inc. v. New York State Dep’t of Taxation and Fin., 932 N.Y.S.2d 243 (N.Y. App. Div. Nov. 3, 2011)
In this case, the court determined that the software program necessary to view certain files produced to the petitioner subject to …posted at 11:07am on Dec 2nd
- November 4th
-
Recent Case Law Provides Guidance for ESI Production
Production of electronically stored information (ESI) is now an expected part of the discovery process, and it is important for counsel to be aware of the recent 1st Department decision in Tener v. Cremer[FOOTNOTE 1] which addressed a variety of issues…
posted at 8:13am on Nov 4th
- October 28th
-
When a Party Requests Native Files….
A Defendant/Producing Party resisted production of email in native file after making general objections to the production format. Linnebur v. United Tel. Ass’n, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124473, 20-21 (D. Kan. Oct. 27, 2011). The Producing Party claimed that producing the email messages printed as paper was “sufficient” for the requesting party to determine the [...]

posted at 3:44pm on Oct 28th
- October 19th
-
Producing Excel Spreadsheets as Tiffs
A Plaintiff produced Excel spreadsheets in TIFF format. As one could expect, the Defendant brought a motion to compel in native file format faster than you can sort a column in ascending order. Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. v. Seamaster Logistics, Inc., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117922 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2011). The Court quickly held [...]

posted at 12:54pm on Oct 19th
- September 8th
-
Rule 502(d) For Dummies With Judge Grimm
Listen to Karl Schieneman, Founder and Owner of Review Less and friend of JurInnov, talk with one of the most influential electronic discovery Judges the Honorable Paul Grimm Chief Magistrate Judge from the United States District Court, District of Maryland. Learn how Rule 502 helps lawyers cope with privilege waiver risks when dealing with [...]
posted at 1:28pm on Sep 8th
- August 17th
-
E-Discovery, Production and Non-Party Privacy
I presented at the Canadian Bar Association Legal Conference and Expo on Tuesday on “e-discovery, production and non-party privacy.” I started by stating that: the litigator’s role is to help the trier of fact uncover the truth; the litigator takes information and uses it as evidence to do so; and it is essential to the [...]

posted at 3:51pm on Aug 17th
- August 12th
-
Carmel Valley eDiscovery Retreat – Buckles Wrap-Up
Wrapping up my coverage of the first Carmel Valley eDiscovery Retreat, it seems strange that almost a month has flown by. Then again, we have been in serious growth mode at eDJ now that Jason Velasco has come on board. As I am working on my ILTA 2011 sessions on Predictive Coding/Remote Collection and the Cloud for Firms, it becomes clear that my sessions in Carmel have changed my expectations of audience participation and content quality for conferences. I put a lot of thought into how to prevent the two classic conference panel killers, ‘Death by Powerpoint’ and the ‘Charlie Brown Speaker’. The informal setting and intimate audience gave me the freedom to take risks that might not have flown as well in the packed, stifling rooms of LTNY.
posted at 3:28pm on Aug 12th
- August 1st
-
Carmel Valley eDiscovery Retreat – Buckles Part 1
The breaking Casey Anthony forensic story has delayed my recap of the first Carmel Valley eDiscovery Retreat last week. Luckily, Barry Murphy managed a good post on day one. Chris LaCour, the event organizer, deserves congratulations for breaking the LTNY event mold. He dared to plan a small scale interactive format heavy with experts in a beautiful venue that encouraged open social dialogue. He recruited Browning Marean, George Socha, Barry Murphy and myself to create focus tracks featuring cutting edge topics for the panelists to debate. This was not the typical sponsor driven marketing messages, but real discussion that actively engaged the audience. I moderated three of my CLE sessions and passed the microphone to Kevin Stehr of Lexis Nexis for the “Defining the eDiscovery Platform” session. The participating providers generally limited themselves to sponsoring meals and social events, which kept the event relatively free of the marketing madness that has dominated the big NY show. I hope that this retreat signals that the eDiscovery market is willing to consider alternative academic, market and social events.
posted at 12:09pm on Aug 1st
- July 16th
-
Master McLeod Reminds Parties to Look Way Ahead in Planning for Production
“Even at the pleading stage parties should have an eye on what issues will be raised by the litigation and therefore what will be the scope of production and discovery.” This statement in a June 24th judgement by Master McLeod seems so trite, but is a worthy reminder given production can be so challenging that [...]

posted at 8:55pm on Jul 16th
- July 5th
-
Catalyst Releases Module to Fully Automate Document Production – Sacramento Bee
Catalyst Releases Module to Fully Automate Document ProductionSacramento BeeCatalyst provides secure, scalable multi-lingual document repositories for electronic discovery, litigation support, and other complex regulatory matters. For over a decade, co…
posted at 2:35pm on Jul 5th