<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>eDiscovery Journal &#187; Predictive Coding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ediscoveryjournal.com/tag/predictive-coding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ediscoveryjournal.com</link>
	<description>Your one-stop source for eDiscovery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 20:13:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Judge Peck Stays Defendant MSL Production in &#8216;Da Silva Moore&#8217; &#8211; Law.com</title>
		<link>http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&#038;fd=R&#038;usg=AFQjCNFHLNuzoMbnIWbnzxdR9PyxuKNxhA&#038;url=http://www.law.com/jsp/law/sign_me_in.jsp?article=http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202553552301&#038;Judge_Peck_Stays_Defendant_MSL_Production_in_Da_Silva_Moore</link>
		<comments>http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&#038;fd=R&#038;usg=AFQjCNFHLNuzoMbnIWbnzxdR9PyxuKNxhA&#038;url=http://www.law.com/jsp/law/sign_me_in.jsp?article=http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202553552301&#038;Judge_Peck_Stays_Defendant_MSL_Production_in_Da_Silva_Moore#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 03:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eDJ Syndicator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caselaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discovery_practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictive Coding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ediscoveryjournal.com/?guid=3a11230b9d89f1c15440f308237fcd4f</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Law.comJudge Peck Stays Defendant MSL Production in &#039;Da Silva Moore&#039;Law.comThe case is being closely monitored by e-discovery professionals because of the court&#039;s approval of a protocol for e-discovery that was initially agreed to by the pa...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2012/05/judge-peck-stays-defendant-msl-production-in-da-silva-moore-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BeyondRecognition: Disruptive Technology Structures the Unstructurable Data</title>
		<link>http://e-discoveryissues.blogspot.com/2012/05/beyondrecognition-disruptive-technology.html</link>
		<comments>http://e-discoveryissues.blogspot.com/2012/05/beyondrecognition-disruptive-technology.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eDJ Syndicator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictive Coding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ediscoveryjournal.com/?guid=3c4abef1323c96b1e083bd80f5895244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beyondrecognition ANNOUNCES IMAGE-BASED DOCUMENT &#160; &#160;CLUSTERING TECHNOLOgy&#160;Technology groups documents based on an image, not textual, analysis, permitting rapid development of cluster-specific, location-based data extraction rulesGERMANT...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2012/05/beyondrecognition-disruptive-technology-structures-the-unstructurable-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are You Ready for the Next Step in Document Review Technology?</title>
		<link>http://e-discoverymyth.com/2012/05/08/are-you-ready-for-the-next-step-in-document-review-technology/</link>
		<comments>http://e-discoverymyth.com/2012/05/08/are-you-ready-for-the-next-step-in-document-review-technology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 18:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eDJ Syndicator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caselaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discovery_practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictive Coding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://e-discoverymyth.com/?p=1818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adding to this week’s Da Silva’s appeal affirmation is the Circuit Court of Loudoun County, Virginia’s support of the use of predictive coding as a culling method for document review.  In Global Aerospace, Inc. v. Landow Aviation, L.P., No. CL 61040 (Vir. Cir. Ct. Apr. 23, 2012), the Court approved the Defendant’s use of predictive coding to cull the asserted 250 gigabytes of reviewable data (about 2 million documents) for review and production.  The court approved predictive coding over the objection of opposing counsel, a distinction between Landow and Judge Peck’s decision in Da Silva Moore v. Publicis Groupe, 2012 &#8230; <a href="http://e-discoverymyth.com/2012/05/08/are-you-ready-for-the-next-step-in-document-review-technology/"><p>[ CONTINUE READING <span>&#8594;</span> ]</p></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://e-discoverymyth.com/2012/05/08/are-you-ready-for-the-next-step-in-document-review-technology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Predictive Coding Endorsed by the Southern District of New York – People plus technology equals smart search</title>
		<link>http://www.ediscoverynavigator.com/2012/05/predictive-coding-endorsed-by-the-southern-district-of-new-york-people-plus-technology-equals-smart-.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.ediscoverynavigator.com/2012/05/predictive-coding-endorsed-by-the-southern-district-of-new-york-people-plus-technology-equals-smart-.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 08:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eDJ Syndicator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caselaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discovery_practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictive Coding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ediscoveryjournal.com/?guid=ccc24660b103958d7d53dbca4113d6c2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Predictive Coding Endorsed by the Southern District of New York – People plus technology equals smart search &#34;Attorneys should not agree to the use of predictive coding or other search...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2012/05/predictive-coding-endorsed-by-the-southern-district-of-new-york-%e2%80%93-people-plus-technology-equals-smart-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Predictive Coding Spell Doom for Entry-Level Associates?</title>
		<link>http://eddblogonline.blogspot.com/2012/05/does-predictive-coding-spell-doom-for.html</link>
		<comments>http://eddblogonline.blogspot.com/2012/05/does-predictive-coding-spell-doom-for.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 17:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eDJ Syndicator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discovery_practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictive Coding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ediscoveryjournal.com/?guid=5486de5de7c3e582de8c8ca8da28f697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Erika C. Birg, partner, Nelson Mullins Riley &#38; Scarborough: When I was a junior associate, the partner for whom I worked made clear that while I may dislike document review, it provided job security because I knew the documents. The same is true to...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2012/05/does-predictive-coding-spell-doom-for-entry-level-associates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Real Winners In Technology-Assisted Review Are&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2012/05/the-real-winners-in-technology-assisted-review-are/</link>
		<comments>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2012/05/the-real-winners-in-technology-assisted-review-are/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 13:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barry Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Original Journal Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caselaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discovery_practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictive Coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ediscoveryjournal.com/?p=197430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s time to make a call: the biggest winner in Technology-Assisted Review (TAR) will be…wait for it…expert witnesses.  For those of you not familiar with the role of an expert witness, according to Federal Rule of Evidence 702, “A witness who is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify in the form of an opinion or otherwise if: (a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue;(b) the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data; (c) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods; and(d) the expert has reliably applied the principles and methods to the facts of the case.” When TAR is involved, such an expert must understand software, review processes and approaches, and advanced statistics – a tall order that will likely lead to hourly rates of over $1,000 for those willing to appear in court and show off their knowledge.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2012/05/the-real-winners-in-technology-assisted-review-are/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Take Two: Reactions to &#8216;Da Silva Moore&#8217; Predictive Coding Order</title>
		<link>http://eddblogonline.blogspot.com/2012/05/take-two-reactions-to-da-silva-moore.html</link>
		<comments>http://eddblogonline.blogspot.com/2012/05/take-two-reactions-to-da-silva-moore.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 01:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eDJ Syndicator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discovery_practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictive Coding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ediscoveryjournal.com/?guid=2bb8ac80df41005d0b63ab8bc4b63300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[E-discovery experts sound notes of enthusiasm and caution over Judge Carter's ruling. There's no shortage of opinions in response to court orders regarding the predictive coding aspects of the da Silva Moore labor law case. In Monique da Silva Moore, e...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2012/05/take-two-reactions-to-da-silva-moore-predictive-coding-order-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Empire Discovery Gets OrcaTec for Predictive Coding &#8211; Law.com</title>
		<link>http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&#038;fd=R&#038;usg=AFQjCNEUya_g2L_bphJwJ4TVklil-zWwdA&#038;url=http://www.law.com/jsp/law/sign_me_in.jsp?article=http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202550935495&#038;Empire_Discovery_Gets_OrcaTec_for_Predictive_Coding</link>
		<comments>http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&#038;fd=R&#038;usg=AFQjCNEUya_g2L_bphJwJ4TVklil-zWwdA&#038;url=http://www.law.com/jsp/law/sign_me_in.jsp?article=http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202550935495&#038;Empire_Discovery_Gets_OrcaTec_for_Predictive_Coding#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 04:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eDJ Syndicator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictive Coding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ediscoveryjournal.com/?guid=642288ef92dc0899341bb8663fe4ce27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Empire Discovery Gets OrcaTec for Predictive CodingLaw.com&#34;OrcaTec enjoys working with partners like Empire Discovery who are already well-known in the marketplace and who have a strong client base in litigation support and e-discovery,&#34; said...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2012/05/empire-discovery-gets-orcatec-for-predictive-coding-law-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nod to Predictive Coding in &#8216;Da Silva Moore&#8217; Stirs Caution, Excitement</title>
		<link>http://eddblogonline.blogspot.com/2012/04/nod-to-predictive-coding-in-da-silva.html</link>
		<comments>http://eddblogonline.blogspot.com/2012/04/nod-to-predictive-coding-in-da-silva.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eDJ Syndicator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discovery_practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictive Coding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ediscoveryjournal.com/?guid=81aaac74c98bb64dc021c06b48003866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Feedback is flying fast around the recent affirmation of Magistrate Judge Andew Peck's predictive coding order in the potentially historic labor law case of Monique da Silva Moore, et al. v. Publicis Group SA, et al, in the U.S. District Court for the ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2012/04/nod-to-predictive-coding-in-da-silva-moore-stirs-caution-excitement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interview with James Moeskops of Millnet on Predictive Coding</title>
		<link>http://chrisdale.wordpress.com/2012/04/30/interview-with-james-moeskops-of-millnet-on-predictive-coding/</link>
		<comments>http://chrisdale.wordpress.com/2012/04/30/interview-with-james-moeskops-of-millnet-on-predictive-coding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eDJ Syndicator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discovery_practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictive Coding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisdale.wordpress.com/?p=7712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the light of Judge Peck&#8217;s Da Silva Moore Opinion approving the use of predictive coding in US Federal civil proceedings, I recently interviewed James Moeskops of Millnet about the use of this technology in English courts. The result is a podca...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chrisdale.wordpress.com/2012/04/30/interview-with-james-moeskops-of-millnet-on-predictive-coding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

