<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>eDiscovery Journal &#187; PC-TAR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ediscoveryjournal.com/tag/pc-tar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ediscoveryjournal.com</link>
	<description>Your one-stop source for eDiscovery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 20:13:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Kleen Products vs Da Silva Moore: Measurement vs Method</title>
		<link>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2012/04/kleen-products-vs-da-silva-moore-measurement-vs-method/</link>
		<comments>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2012/04/kleen-products-vs-da-silva-moore-measurement-vs-method/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Buckles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Original Journal Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caselaw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC-TAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictive Coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Assisted Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ediscoveryjournal.com/?p=193819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have read more eDiscovery caselaw and commentary on these two matters in the last month than I ever wanted to. Although the issues around Technology Assisted Review (TAR) are important, it appears that the fervor and hype is being driven primarily by a wide variety of parties who are attempting to capitalize on the matters. Call me naïve, but it astounds me that any eDiscovery consultant or provider participating in an active case would publicize hearing transcripts, create press releases or otherwise put their own interests ahead of their clients. In Da Silva Moore the parties demonstrated laudable cooperation and agreement prior to the first hearing. They agreed to a relatively transparent protocol to tackle a massive collection. All of that has broken down and now there appears to be what could be a concerted effort to discredit magistrate judge Peck and force a recusal. Wow. Would this promising case have turned so acrimonious without the heavy publicity and marketing budgets of TAR providers? Possibly. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2012/04/kleen-products-vs-da-silva-moore-measurement-vs-method/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Linear Review Dead?</title>
		<link>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2012/03/is-linear-review-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2012/03/is-linear-review-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 13:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Buckles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Original Journal Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC-TAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ediscoveryjournal.com/?p=190358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week I was a panelist at the 2012 Masters Series event in Houston and enjoyed the lively and frank discussions about purchasing trends, privacy issues and more that continued into the social gathering afterward. As you might expect, predictive coding and the latest Da Silva filing were a hot topic, especially amongst providers of managed review. One remark by Jim Wagner, CEO of DiscoverReady, resonated with me and I told him that I was going to steal it for a blog. To paraphrase, “The market sees linear review as disorganized review.” He was right on target. Linear review has become synonymous with plowing through millions of randomized email/documents in the least efficient or effective manner. I ask you, “In the last 5 years, have you reviewed collections that had not been culled, searched, prioritized, deduplicated, email threaded or otherwise optimized for review batching?” ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2012/03/is-linear-review-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Technology-Assisted Review: The Need for Market Definition and Where We Stand Today</title>
		<link>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2012/03/technology-assisted-review-the-need-for-market-definition-and-where-we-stand-today/</link>
		<comments>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2012/03/technology-assisted-review-the-need-for-market-definition-and-where-we-stand-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mikki Tomlinson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Original Journal Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC-TAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictive Coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Assisted Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ediscoveryjournal.com/?p=189321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Buzz about new technologies always precedes adoption.  And one of the outcomes of  “technology buzz” is development of the market definition to its consumers.  The market message and definition of Predictive Coding or Technology Assisted Review  (“TAR”) is, without a doubt, still evolving and there is certainly a plethora of buzz. The simple fact that we, as an industry, cannot agree on a general term for “it” is evidence enough that there are still a lot of untraveled roads that remain to be mapped.  “Predictive coding” was the first label that took hold as a result of the marketing efforts of an industry leader.  In his February 24, 2012 opinion in the Da Silva Moore, et al. vs. Publicis Groupe, et al. case, The Honorable Andrew J. Peck referred to it as “Computer Assisted Review”.  In the yet to be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2012/03/technology-assisted-review-the-need-for-market-definition-and-where-we-stand-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Technology-Assisted Review Co-Exist With Strategic Search? &#8211; Metropolitan Corporate Counsel</title>
		<link>http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&#038;fd=R&#038;usg=AFQjCNHqPhUIbhKwbwzqQOnLIzrfumRZ6w&#038;url=http://www.metrocorpcounsel.com/articles/18351/can-technology-assisted-review-co-exist-strategic-search</link>
		<comments>http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&#038;fd=R&#038;usg=AFQjCNHqPhUIbhKwbwzqQOnLIzrfumRZ6w&#038;url=http://www.metrocorpcounsel.com/articles/18351/can-technology-assisted-review-co-exist-strategic-search#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 22:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eDJ Syndicator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC-TAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ediscoveryjournal.com/?guid=88731bb69f43ad8d58caceda52cbe715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can Technology-Assisted Review Co-Exist With Strategic Search?Metropolitan Corporate CounselJones: I am a senior search consultant with Xerox Litigation Services, the e-discovery division of Xerox. We help clients address complex e-discovery challenges...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2012/03/can-technology-assisted-review-co-exist-with-strategic-search-metropolitan-corporate-counsel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Predictive Coding Is a New Tool in the E-Discovery Toolbox</title>
		<link>http://eddblogonline.blogspot.com/2012/03/predictive-coding-is-new-tool-in-e.html</link>
		<comments>http://eddblogonline.blogspot.com/2012/03/predictive-coding-is-new-tool-in-e.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eDJ Syndicator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discovery_practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC-TAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictive Coding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ediscoveryjournal.com/?guid=bd0ad59d3dd950eee498af8969413c36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Technology has led to an explosion in the amount of electronically stored information (ESI) maintained by corporations and individuals. Litigators and legal departments face the challenge of keeping the costs associated with discovery under control whi...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2012/03/predictive-coding-is-a-new-tool-in-the-e-discovery-toolbox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Predictive coding? Technology-Assisted Review? What is the right name?</title>
		<link>http://chrisdale.wordpress.com/2012/03/16/predictive-coding-technology-assisted-review-what-is-the-right-name/</link>
		<comments>http://chrisdale.wordpress.com/2012/03/16/predictive-coding-technology-assisted-review-what-is-the-right-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eDJ Syndicator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC-TAR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisdale.wordpress.com/?p=7303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is perhaps not surprising that we have yet to arrive at a universal name for the set of algorithms and processes which lie at the higher end of the eDiscovery / eDisclosure market. Barry Murphy addresses this in an eDiscovery Journal article called ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chrisdale.wordpress.com/2012/03/16/predictive-coding-technology-assisted-review-what-is-the-right-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Technology-Assisted Review: What Should We Call This Market?</title>
		<link>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2012/03/technology-assisted-review-what-should-we-call-this-market/</link>
		<comments>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2012/03/technology-assisted-review-what-should-we-call-this-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barry Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Original Journal Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discovery_practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC-TAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictive Coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ediscoveryjournal.com/?p=187937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to all who attended our technology-assisted review (TAR) for eDiscovery webinar.  There was a great turnout and our guests – Chuck Rothman of Wortzman Nickle and Thomas Gricks of Schnader, Harrison, Segal &#038; Lewis – offered valuable insights on how to use TAR and get value from it.  Chuck also contributed an article to eDiscoveryJournal this week on what predictive coding really is.  Chuck’s article title points out the confusion in the market about what different terms actually mean.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2012/03/technology-assisted-review-what-should-we-call-this-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Future of the Review Attorney</title>
		<link>http://www.eddupdate.com/2012/03/the-future-of-the-review-attorney.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.eddupdate.com/2012/03/the-future-of-the-review-attorney.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eDJ Syndicator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[From The Blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discovery_practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC-TAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictive Coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eddupdate.com/2012/03/the-future-of-the-review-attorney.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the advent of computer-assisted review, it is difficult to know how the review industry will ultimately be impacted. Certainly, we can infer that the days of 100-attorney reviews that go on for months on end are coming to a conclusion. Does this increased efficiency bode that more "microwave" reviews will take place, perhaps with clients electing to review sets of documents that would not have previously been reviewed due to higher cost? What will become of the current field of attorneys that have become dependent on review projects to sustain their legal careers while they await more permanent employment? Will large firms continue to sustain massive contract review staffs, or will review specialists develop niche areas of skills, such as securities, or patent law? Hard to predict, but events certainly point toward a contraction in the legal industry, with fewer jobs available to those who don't secure law firm employment upon graduation. A problematic part of attorney review is the disparity between the function vendors provide for clients and the educational requirement expected of those who participate in the process, i.e. nobody went to law school to review documents on a computer all day. As review teams shrink, e-discovery vendors like Minnesota-based NightOwl now operate more like a small law firm where they strive to create a collegial environment on the review floor that fosters collaboration between reviewers and staff and treats each reviewer as an important part of the legal process. They also designate a "lead attorney" on each review project. These attorneys are retained to understand not only the complexities of the project they are working on, but also to share expertise with outside counsel on the nuances of the review process. The future of document review may actually turn out to be healthy for review attorneys as operations start to look less like sweatshops and more like what NightOwl is doing. Image by Clipart.com]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2012/03/the-future-of-the-review-attorney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is this Predictive Coding thing Anyway?</title>
		<link>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2012/03/what-is-this-predictive-coding-thing-anyway/</link>
		<comments>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2012/03/what-is-this-predictive-coding-thing-anyway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Rothman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Original Journal Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discovery_practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC-TAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictive Coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Assisted Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ediscoveryjournal.com/?p=187437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone who has read about e-Discovery in the past year has almost certainly come across the term “Predictive Coding” or one of its aliases. As exemplified by the number of seminars and vendor’s banners at Legal Tech in New York this past month, it’s definitely this year’s e-Discovery craze. However, like most technology trends, the term “Predictive Coding” has come to mean a lot of different things. While fighting my way through the throngs of legal techno-geeks on the LegalTech vendors floor, I came across no fewer than ten completely different definitions of the term. The definitions ranged from “a system that assists in separating the legal wheat from the chaff”, “a system that proposes to automatically cull data before its collected”, to “a system that provides “predictive” objective coding of scanned images”. Almost every vendor seemed to want to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2012/03/what-is-this-predictive-coding-thing-anyway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interview with Jeff Nadalo from TransCanada Pipeline &#8211; Predictive Coding and Why You Should Care About It</title>
		<link>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2012/03/interview-with-jeff-nadalo-from-transcanada-pipeline-predictive-coding-and-why-you-should-care-about-it/</link>
		<comments>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2012/03/interview-with-jeff-nadalo-from-transcanada-pipeline-predictive-coding-and-why-you-should-care-about-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amber Scorah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Original Journal Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discovery_practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC-TAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictive Coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Assisted Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ediscoveryjournal.com/?p=187018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The paradigm of review is changing.  Predictive coding has made a huge impact in the e-discovery and document review world.  In this interview, I speak with Jeff Nadalo, Litigation Counsel at TransCanada Pipeline.  He helps cut through all the marketing jargon to give an understanding of the technical and realistic implications of predictive coding, and how it can affect your e-discovery practice. Amber Scorah: What do the courts think?  Is predictive coding defensible? Jeff Nadalo: I think we certainly are seeing that.  There are some recent cases coming out which are indicating that predictive coding is certainly an acceptable means of minimizing the resources that it takes to perform large-scale discovery. Amber Scorah: If your competitors are leveraging this technology, should you? Jeff Nadalo: TransCanada has invested heavily in predictive coding and I think the key reason is that it can pay for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2012/03/interview-with-jeff-nadalo-from-transcanada-pipeline-predictive-coding-and-why-you-should-care-about-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

