Posts Tagged ‘compliance’



show story details [+]hide story details [-]
  • AGs challenge Google on new privacy policy

    Attorney General George Jepsen joined with attorneys general of 36 states and territories Wednesday in raising strong concerns about a new privacy policy by Google, Inc., scheduled to take effect March 1 for all users of Google products and services. U…



  • Enterprise Cloud Services Look for Security and Compliance Solutions

    Christian Verstraete of HP’s Manufacturing and Distributions Industries Worldwide, recently published, “3 Key Reasons for Enterprise Cloud Services.” He argues there is a place for the Enterprise Cloud alongside the private Cloud and public Cloud. Focus on business critical tasks, namely security, is needed for enterprise cloud services to really take-off. Verstraete also addresses compliance [...]



  • SocialLogix and DigitalMailer Partner to Deliver Social Media Compliance Solutions to Financial Institutions

    In addition, SocialSentry offers the ability to monitor select users or the entire employee base and archive all social media communication for future analysis or . Because SocialSentry is a Software-as-a-Service offering, companies …



  • SocialLogix and DigitalMailer Partner to Deliver Social Media Compliance Solutions to Financial Institutions

    SocialLogix Inc., a leading provider of social media risk and compliance solutions, and DigitalMailer, a leader in providing digital communication solutions to the financial instit



  • Sprint Welcomes TextGuard™ Mobile Device Compliance Solutions for Enterprises to Sprint Biz App Marketplace

    A person has the ability to review the messages on a website for audits, requests, liability concerns and other corporate governance issues. Access to the TextGuard solution for enterprises adds to an already impressive array of offerings in …



  • Developing an In-House eDiscovery Process: Getting Started

    The impact of discovery in this era of electronic information explosion has greatly affected corporations that are full-time litigants. These effects go all the way to the core of their businesses in terms of cost, risk, and management of information. The resulting position for organizations has become reactive, and discovery costs have spiraled out of control. Over the last several years there has been a good deal of discussion on the value of bringing eDiscovery processes in-house – often referred to as “litigation readiness.” The goal of developing an in-house eDiscovery program is to manage it as a business process, thus gaining efficiency and cost control.



  • Practical QC in eDiscovery

    One key element for transforming your eDiscovery from an ad hoc reactive fire drill into a mature, proactive business process is the development and implementation of formal Quality Assurance(QA) and Quality Control(QC). I have always viewed QA as tackling ongoing process improvement such as regular cross case comparisons, while QC tends to be checking on did the process perform properly. Basically, how can we make the process better versus did everything work right? When interviewing corporate client eDiscovery teams, everyone is conscious of the need for QA/QC, but the vast majority seem to feel that it is impractical or unrealistic given their tight deadlines, lack of resources and typical fire-fighter mentality. Some law firm clients have swung to the opposite extreme, with elaborate workflow, check lists, physical chain of custody forms and more. Their QC has grown out of reasonable proportion and their productivity suffers because their overall QA has been neglected. So how do we achieve a reasonable quality process without bringing the legal process to a halt?



  • A Corporate Compliance Officer Lesson From MF Global

    The ongoing MF Global controversy provides corporate counsel an opportunity to share with client leadership an important and very practical lesson with respect to the role of the corporate compliance, or risk, officer.

    InhouseBlog.com



  • Congress Says eDiscovery Not a Burden – What Do You Think?

    It seems that Congress feels the need to weigh in on the costs of eDiscovery. Articles from LTN, CMSwire, Law.com and many other bloggers take many different perspectives on the commentary and Q&A session. We went to the House report to try to extract some of the highlights. My biggest take away is that we really do not have any solid metrics and objective market data on the true cost of eDiscovery. The comments focused on the cost and burden of preservation, especially on matters that never become actual litigation. Republican subcommittee members stressed the costs while Democrats questioned the relevance and corporate donor origin of the hearing itself in light of the active rule evaluation by the Judicial Conference. So here are some of the notable statements with my own perspective on them.



  • How the Proposed 2012 EU Directive on Data Privacy Could Impact Social Media

    Last week we held a senior executive round table event at Claridges and one of the topics of discussion was about the proposed European Union (EU) directive on data privacy and the potential impact of this on social media.As current EU data laws were c…