Posts Tagged ‘analysis’
hide story details [-]
- January 30th
-
RDC Analytics Launches as Content Analytics Consulting Firm to Dramatically Expedite and Lower Cost and Risk of eDiscovery
RDC Analytics, a consulting firm focused on utilizing content analytics to analyze unstructured data for eDiscovery, launched today at LegalTech New York (booth #524). This innovative firm leverages language to interpret and understand content (content…
posted at 8:00am on Jan 30th
- January 23rd
-
Equivio Releases Zoom, an E-discovery Platform for Predictive Coding and Analytics
KENSINGTON, Md., Jan. 23, 2012 /PRNewswire/ — Equivio, a provider of analytical solutions for e‑discovery, announced today that it has launched Equivio Zoom, a single integrated platform for predictive …
posted at 10:00am on Jan 23rd
- January 17th
-
2012: The Year Of Technology-Assisted Review In eDiscovery – Forbes
Forbes2012: The Year Of Technology-Assisted Review In eDiscoveryForbesAs Amanda Jones and Ben Kershberg pointed out in their excellent article, “What Technology-Assisted Electronic Discovery Teaches Us About the Role of Humans In Technology,” the r…
posted at 2:12pm on Jan 17th
- January 13th
-
Legal Hydra — Top Ten Tips To Become More Proficient With Machine-Assisted Review – Forbes
Legal Hydra — Top Ten Tips To Become More Proficient With Machine-Assisted ReviewForbesYet, when it comes to electronic discovery, a discipline that permeates every type of modern litigation, many of today's lawyers are hobbling themselves through…
posted at 10:27am on Jan 13th
- January 12th
-
eDJ Survey On Predictive Coding And Debate Over PC-TAR Term
A recent Forbes blog by by Amanda Jones & Ben Kerschberg pointed out how technology-assisted review in eDiscovery can increase review accuracy and decrease overall review costs. The article mainly refers to the use of predictive coding, but touches on what has been called “technology assisted review.” Last month, Jason Velasco here at eDJ offered up the acronym PC-TAR (predictive coding – technology assisted review) to avoid controversy.
posted at 9:16am on Jan 12th
- January 9th
-
What Technology-Assisted Electronic Discovery Teaches Us About The Role Of Humans In Technology
by Amanda Jones & Ben Kerschberg
posted at 10:29am on Jan 9th
- January 6th
-
Equivio Announces "Inside-Relativity" Version of its Analytics Technology – Sacramento Bee
Equivio Announces "Inside-Relativity" Version of its Analytics TechnologySacramento BeeRelativity also powers Method, kCura's workflow and notification system for managing legal hold and risk assessment processes. kCura helps corporations…
posted at 1:15pm on Jan 6th
-
Research Evolves On Predictive Coding-Technology Assisted Review (PC-TAR)
One of eDJ’s predictions for 2012 is that PC-TAR (predictive coding-technology assisted review) goes mainstream. Instead of just sitting and waiting to see what happens with PC-TAR, we are actively researching it. Watch for the launch of an eDJ survey on the topic next week (and the chance to win yet another prize from eDJ for participating in our research). Jason Velasco did a call-out for anyone using PC-TAR to speak with us and we’ve been able to talk to actual practitioners. I want to quickly share some of what we are learning and call for anyone else trying PC-TAR to email us and share your story.
posted at 12:17pm on Jan 6th
- January 3rd
-
What is predictive coding and can it help me? – Canadian Lawyer Magazine
What is predictive coding and can it help me?Canadian Lawyer MagazinePredictive coding are the new e-discovery buzzwords. Articles about the benefits of predictive coding have appeared in Forbes magazine and The New York Times. In mid-2011, one company…
posted at 9:55am on Jan 3rd
- December 27th
-
Practical QC in eDiscovery
One key element for transforming your eDiscovery from an ad hoc reactive fire drill into a mature, proactive business process is the development and implementation of formal Quality Assurance(QA) and Quality Control(QC). I have always viewed QA as tackling ongoing process improvement such as regular cross case comparisons, while QC tends to be checking on did the process perform properly. Basically, how can we make the process better versus did everything work right? When interviewing corporate client eDiscovery teams, everyone is conscious of the need for QA/QC, but the vast majority seem to feel that it is impractical or unrealistic given their tight deadlines, lack of resources and typical fire-fighter mentality. Some law firm clients have swung to the opposite extreme, with elaborate workflow, check lists, physical chain of custody forms and more. Their QC has grown out of reasonable proportion and their productivity suffers because their overall QA has been neglected. So how do we achieve a reasonable quality process without bringing the legal process to a halt?
posted at 10:02am on Dec 27th