<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LTNY 2010 Part 2 – ECA Everywhere</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2010/02/ltny-2010-part-2-%e2%80%93-eca-everywhere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2010/02/ltny-2010-part-2-%e2%80%93-eca-everywhere/</link>
	<description>Your one-stop source for eDiscovery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 19:29:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArtSCC</title>
		<link>http://ediscoveryjournal.com/2010/02/ltny-2010-part-2-%e2%80%93-eca-everywhere/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>ArtSCC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ediscoveryjournal.com/?p=5733#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Vendors like to append labels to their products to indicate to customers into which of the many e-discovery cubby holes their products fit.   The trouble is they don&#039;t apply labels (like ECA) consistently.  To me, the major problem with the ECA label is that it attempts to append a technological solution to the early evaluation of electronic discovery issues when, in large measure, the earliest assessment is a purely human endeavor, comprised of interviews and probing questions by the managing lawyers.   Technology comes into play only after key systems, custodians and issues have been identified.   To call it &#039;early&#039; case assessment is a real misnomer.  I would prefer to call that genre of software tools Electronic Data Inventory Assessment or something similar.

(If vendors start showing up with EDIA products, you heard it here first.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vendors like to append labels to their products to indicate to customers into which of the many e-discovery cubby holes their products fit.   The trouble is they don&#8217;t apply labels (like ECA) consistently.  To me, the major problem with the ECA label is that it attempts to append a technological solution to the early evaluation of electronic discovery issues when, in large measure, the earliest assessment is a purely human endeavor, comprised of interviews and probing questions by the managing lawyers.   Technology comes into play only after key systems, custodians and issues have been identified.   To call it &#8216;early&#8217; case assessment is a real misnomer.  I would prefer to call that genre of software tools Electronic Data Inventory Assessment or something similar.</p>
<p>(If vendors start showing up with EDIA products, you heard it here first.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

